Paper detail

Cosmological Implications of a Stellar Initial Mass Function that Varies with the Jeans Mass in Galaxies

Observations of star-forming galaxies at high-z have suggested discrepancies in the inferred star formation rates (SFRs) either between data and models, or between complementary measures of the SFR. These putative discrepancies could all be alleviated if the stellar IMF is systematically weighted toward more high-mass star formation in rapidly star-forming galaxies. Here, we explore how the IMF might vary under the central assumption that the turnover mass in the IMF, Mc, scales with the Jeans mass in giant molecular clouds (GMCs), M_J. We employ hydrodynamic and radiative transfer simulations of galaxies to predict how the typical GMC Jeans mass, and hence the IMF, varies with galaxy property. We then study the impact of such an IMF on the star formation law, the SFR-M* relation, submillimetre galaxies (SMGs), and the cosmic SFR density. Our main results are: The H2 mass-weighted Jeans mass in a galaxy scales with the SFR when the SFR is greater a few M_sun/yr. SPS modeling shows that this results in a nonlinear relation between SFR and Lbol, such that SFR Lbol^0.88. Using this model relation, the inferred SFR of local ULIRGs decreases by ~2, and that of high-z SMGs decreases by ~3-5. At z 2, this results in a lowered normalisation of the SFR-M* relation in better agreement with models, a reduced discrepancy between the observed cosmic SFR density and stellar mass density evolution, and SMG SFRs that are easier to accommodate in current hierarchical structure formation models. It further results in a Schmidt relation with slope of ~1.6 when utilising a physically motivated form for the CO-H2 conversion factor. While each of the discrepancies considered here could be alleviated without appealing to a varying IMF, the modest variation implied by assuming Mc M_J is a plausible solution that simultaneously addresses numerous thorny issues regarding the SFRs of high-z galaxies.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.