Paper detail

Cosmological GRBs: Internal vs. External Shocks

Internal (IS) or external (ES) shocks in relativistic expanding shells are currently the best known mechanism for producing GRBs. We calculate the hydrodynamic conditions and the cooling processes in internal shocks, that occur when one layer overtakes another. We compare these conditions with the conditions in external shocks that occur when the shell encounters the ISM. We find that the complicated temporal structure observed in GRBs could be easily explained in IS scenario. Unlike ES, the observed temporal structure simply reflects the temporal behavior of the internal engine that produces the shell. We also find that opacity and in particular the opacity for pair production poses strong constraints on the parameter space and consequently bursts with very narrow peaks are expected to be optically thick and would not contain GeV photons. Finally we find that as in ES synchrotron is the most likely radiation process.

preprint1996arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.