Paper detail

Cosmological Forecast for non-Gaussian Statistics in large-scale weak Lensing Surveys

Cosmic shear data contains a large amount of cosmological information encapsulated in the non-Gaussian features of the weak lensing mass maps. This information can be extracted using non-Gaussian statistics. We compare the constraining power in the $Ω_{\mathrm{m}} - σ_8$ plane of three map-based non-Gaussian statistics with the angular power spectrum, namely; peak/minimum counts and Minkowski functionals. We further analyze the impact of tomography and systematic effects originating from galaxy intrinsic alignments, multiplicative shear bias and photometric redshift systematics. We forecast the performance of the statistics for a stage-3-like weak lensing survey and restrict ourselves to scales $\geq$ 10 arcmin. We find, that in our setup, the considered non-Gaussian statistics provide tighter constraints than the angular power spectrum. The peak counts show the greatest potential, increasing the Figure-of-Merit (FoM) in the $Ω_{\mathrm{m}} - σ_8$ plane by a factor of about 4. A combined analysis using all non-Gaussian statistics in addition to the power spectrum increases the FoM by a factor of 5 and reduces the error on $S_8$ by $\approx$ 25\%. We find that the importance of tomography is diminished when combining non-Gaussian statistics with the angular power spectrum. The non-Gaussian statistics indeed profit less from tomography and the minimum counts and Minkowski functionals add some robustness against galaxy intrinsic alignment in a non-tomographic setting. We further find that a combination of the angular power spectrum and the non-Gaussian statistics allows us to apply conservative scale cuts in the analysis, thus helping to minimize the impact of baryonic and relativistic effects, while conserving the cosmological constraining power. We make the code that was used to conduct this analysis publicly available.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.