Paper detail

Cosmological fluctuations: Comparing Quantum and Classical Statistical and Stringy Effects

The theory of cosmological fluctuations assumes that the pre-inflationary state of the universe was the quantum vacuum of a scalar field(s) coupled to gravity. The observed cosmic microwave background fluctuations are then interpreted as quantum fluctuations. Here we consider alternate interpretations of the classic calculations of scalar and tensor power spectra by replacing the Bunch-Davies quantum vacuum with a classical statistical distribution, which may have been the consequence of a pre-inflationary process of decoherence as in the quantum cosmology literature. Mathematically they are essentially identical calculations. However if one takes the latter interpretation then one might replace the Planck length by for instance the fundamental length scale of string theory. In particular this changes the relation between the scale of inflation and the scalar power spectrum but leaves the parameter(s) characterizing the bi-spectrum unchanged at leading order. Differences will occur however at higher order in the loop expansion. We also discuss the relation to theories with low sound speed and/or a period of dissipation during inflation (warm inflation).

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.