Paper detail

COSMOLOGICAL EXPERIMENTS IN SUPERFLUIDS AND SUPERCONDUCTORS

Evolution of the order parameter in condensed matter analogues of cosmological phase transitions is discussed. It is shown that the density of the frozen-out topological defects is set by the competition between the quench rate -- the rate at which the phase transition is taking place -- and the relaxation rate of the order parameter. More specifically, the characteristic domain size which determines the typical distance separating topological defects in the new broken symmetry phase (and, therefore, their density) is determined by the correlation length at the instant at which the relaxation timescale of the order parameter is equal to the time from the phase transition. This scenario shares with the Kibble mechanism the idea that topological defects will appear ``in between'' domains with independently chosen broken symmetry vacuum. However, it differs from the original proposal in estimating the size of such domains through the non-equilibrium aspects of the transition (quench rate), rather than through the Ginzburg temperature at which thermally activated symmetry restoration can still occur in the correlation - length sized volumes of the broken symmetry phase. This scenario can be employed to analyze recent superfluid quench experiments carried out in bulk He$^4$ to study the analogue of the ``cosmological'' prediction of significant vortex line production. It can be also applied to superfluid quenches in annular geometry, as well as to the rapid phase transition from the normal metal to superconductor, where the symmetry breaking occurs in the order parameter with the local (rather than a global) gauge. Cosmological implications of the revised defect formation scenario with the critical domain size set by the freeze-out time rather than by the Ginzburg temperature are also briefly considered.

preprint1995arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.