Paper detail

Cosmological Constraints on Bose-Einstein-Condensed Scalar Field Dark Matter

(Abridged) Despite the success of Cold Dark Matter (CDM) in explaining a wide range of observations, the microscopic nature of dark matter is still unknown. Attempts to detect WIMPs, the most commonly studied form, have not yet succeeded. Some predictions are even in apparent conflict with observations (e.g. cuspy-cored halos and `missing satellite problem&#39;). Therefore, it is important to consider different forms of CDM. We focus on dark matter comprised of ultralight bosons that form a Bose-Einstein Condensate (BEC), described by a complex scalar field, and solve the Klein-Gordon and Einstein field equations to evolve the Friedmann-Robertson-Walker universe. We find, in addition to phases of radiation-, matter- and Λ-domination, an earlier phase of scalar-field-domination. Moreover, while WIMP CDM is non-relativistic at all times after it decouples, BEC scalar field dark matter (SFDM) is relativistic at early times, evolving from stiff to radiation-like, before it becomes non-relativistic (CDM-like) at late times. The timing of transitions between these phases yields fundamental constraints on SFDM model parameters, particle mass m and self-interaction coupling strength λ. We derive the range of particle parameters required to match observations of the evolving background universe, including the CMB and abundances of light elements produced by BBN, characterized by N_eff, the effective number of neutrino species, and the epoch of matter-radiation equality z_eq. This yields m >= 2.4*10^{-21} eV/c^2 and 9.5*10^{-19} eV^{-1}cm^3 <= λ/(mc^2)^2 <= 4*10^{-17} eV^{-1}cm^3. Our model accommodates current observations in which N_eff at BBN is higher than at z_eq, as probed by the CMB, otherwise unexplained by WIMP CDM. SFDM without self-interaction (`Fuzzy Dark Matter&#39;) cannot satisfy current BBN constraints within 68% confidence and is therefore disfavored.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.