Paper detail

Cosmological constraints from the redshift dependence of the Alcock-Paczynski effect: Fourier space analysis

The tomographic Alcock-Paczynski (AP) method utilizes the redshift evolution of the AP distortion to place constraints on cosmological parameters. It has proved to be a robust method that can separate the AP signature from the redshift space distortion (RSD) effect, and deliver powerful cosmological constraints using the $\lesssim 40h^{-1}\ \rm Mpc$ clustering region. In previous works, the tomographic AP method was performed via the anisotropic 2-point correlation function statistic. In this work we consider the feasibility of conducting the analysis in the Fourier domain and examine the pros and cons of this approach. We use the integrated galaxy power spectrum (PS) as a function of direction, $\hat P_{Δk}(μ)$, to quantify the magnitude of anisotropy in the large-scale structure clustering, and use its redshift variation to do the AP test. The method is tested on the large, high resolution Big-MultiDark Planck (BigMD) simulation at redshifts $z=0-1$, using the underlying true cosmology $Ω_m=0.3071,\ w=-1$. Testing the redshift evolution of $\hat P_{Δk}(μ)$ in the true cosmology and cosmologies deviating from the truth with $δΩ_m=0.1,\ δw=0.3$, we find that the redshift evolution of the AP distortion overwhelms the effects created by the RSD by a factor of $\sim1.7-3.6$. We test the method in the range of $k\in(0.2,1.8)\ h\ \rm Mpc^{-1}$, and find that it works well throughout the entire regime. We tune the halo mass within the range $2\times 10^{13}$ to $10^{14}\ M_{\odot}$, and find that the change of halo bias results in $\lesssim 5 \%$ change in $\hat P_{Δk}(μ)$, which is less significant compared with the cosmological effect. Our work shows that it is feasible to conduct the tomographic AP analysis in the Fourier space.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.