Paper detail

Cosmological constraints from the CFHTLenS shear measurements using a new, accurate and flexible way of predicting nonlinear mass clustering

We explore the cosmological constraints from cosmic shear using a new way of modelling the non-linear matter correlation functions. The new formalism extends the method of Angulo & White (2010), which manipulates outputs of $N$-body simulations to represent the three-dimensional nonlinear mass distribution in different cosmological scenarios. We show that predictions from our approach for shear two-point correlations at $1$ to $300$ arcmin separations are accurate at the $\sim10$\% level, even for extreme changes in cosmology. For moderate changes, with target cosmologies similar to that preferred by analyses of recent Planck data, the accuracy is close to $\sim5$\%. We combine this approach with a MonteCarlo Markov Chain sampler to explore constraints on a $Λ$CDM model from the shear correlation functions measured in the Canada-France Hawaii Telescope Lensing Survey (CFHTLenS). We obtain constraints on the parameter combination $σ_8 (Ω_m/0.27)^{0.6} = 0.801 \pm 0.028$. Combined with results from CMB data, we obtain marginalised constraints on $σ_8 = 0.81 \pm 0.01$ and $Ω_m = 0.29 \pm 0.01$. These results are fully compatible with previous analyses, which supports the validity of our approach. We discuss the advantages of our method and the potential it offers, including a path to incorporate in detail the effects of baryons, among others effects, in future high-precision cosmological analyses.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.