Paper detail

COSMOLOGICAL CONSTRAINTS FROM CLUSTER X-RAY MORPHOLOGIES

We use a representative sample of 65 galaxy clusters observed with the Einstein IPC to constrain the range of cluster X-ray morphologies. We develop and apply quantitative and reproducible measures to constrain the intrinsic distributions of emission weighted centroid variation, axial ratio, orientation, and the radial fall--off. We then use the range of cluster X--ray morphologies to constrain three generic cosmological models (Omega=1, Omega_0=0.2, and Omega_0=0.2 & lambda_0=0.8). For each of these models, we evolve eight sets of Gaussian random initial conditions consistent with an effective power spectrum $P(k)\propto k^{-1}$ on cluster scales. Using this sample of 24 numerical cluster simulations, we compare the X--ray morphologies of the observed and simulated clusters. The comparisons indicate that: (i) cluster centroid variations, axial ratios, and radial fall-offs are sensitive to the underlying cosmological model, and (ii) galaxy clusters with the observed range of X--ray morphologies are very unlikely in low Omega_0 cosmologies. The analysis favors the Omega=1 model, though some discrepancies remain. We discuss the effects of changing the initial conditions and including additional physics in the simulations.

preprint1995arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.