Cosmological Analysis of Three-Dimensional BOSS Galaxy Clustering and Planck CMB Lensing Cross Correlations via Lagrangian Perturbation Theory

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Abstract

We present a formalism for jointly fitting pre- and post-reconstruction redshift-space clustering (RSD) and baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO) plus gravitational lensing (of the CMB) that works directly with the observed 2-point statistics. The formalism is based upon (effective) Lagrangian perturbation theory and a Lagrangian bias expansion, which models RSD, BAO and galaxy-lensing cross correlations within a consistent dynamical framework. As an example we present an analysis of clustering measured by the Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey in combination with CMB lensing measured by Planck. The post-reconstruction BAO strongly constrains the distance-redshift relation, the full-shape redshift-space clustering constrains the matter density and growth rate, and CMB lensing constrains the clustering amplitude. Using only the redshift space data we obtain Ωm=0.303±0.008Ω_\mathrm{m} = 0.303\pm 0.008, H0=69.21±0.78H_0 = 69.21\pm 0.78 and σ8=0.743±0.043σ_8 = 0.743\pm 0.043. The addition of lensing information, even when restricted to the Northern Galactic Cap, improves constraints to Ωm=0.300±0.008Ω_m = 0.300 \pm 0.008, H0=69.21±0.77H_0 = 69.21 \pm 0.77 and σ8=0.707±0.035σ_8 = 0.707 \pm 0.035, in tension with CMB and cosmic shear constraints. The combination of ΩmΩ_m and H0H_0 are consistent with Planck, though their constraints derive mostly from redshift-space clustering. The low σ8σ_8 value are driven by cross correlations with CMB lensing in the low redshift bin (z≃0.38z\simeq 0.38) and at large angular scales, which show a 20%20\% deficit compared to expectations from galaxy clustering alone. We conduct several systematics tests on the data and find none that could fully explain these tensions.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.