Paper detail

Cosmic transparency: A test with the baryon acoustic feature and type Ia supernovae

Conservation of the phase-space density of photons plus Lorentz invariance requires that the cosmological luminosity distance be larger than the angular diameter distance by a factor of $(1+z)^2$, where $z$ is the redshift. Because this is a fundamental symmetry, this prediction--known sometimes as the "Etherington relation" or the "Tolman test"--is independent of world model, or even the assumptions of homogeneity and isotropy. It depends, however, on Lorentz invariance and transparency. Transparency can be affected by intergalactic dust or interactions between photons and the dark sector. Baryon acoustic feature and type Ia supernovae measures of the expansion history are differently sensitive to the angular diameter and luminosity distances and can therefore be used in conjunction to limit cosmic transparency. At the present day, the comparison only limits the change $Δτ$ in the optical depth from redshift 0.20 to 0.35 at visible wavelengths to $Δτ< 0.13$ at 95% confidence. In a model with a constant comoving number density $n$ of scatterers of constant proper cross-section $σ$, this limit implies $n σ< 2\times10^{-4} h \Mpc^{-1}$. These limits depend weakly on the cosmological world model. Within the next few years, the limits could extend to redshifts $z\approx2.5$ and improve to $n σ<1.1 \times10^{-5} h \Mpc^{-1}$. Cosmic variance will eventually limit the sensitivity of any test using the BAF at the $n σ\sim 4\times10^{-7} h \Mpc^{-1}$ level. Comparison with other measures of the transparency is provided; no other measure in the visible is as free of astrophysical assumptions.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.