Paper detail

Cosmic Transients Test Einstein's Equivalence Principle out to GeV Energies

The Einstein Equivalence Principle (EEP) can be probed with astrophysical sources emitting simultaneously different types of neutral particles, or particles with varying energies, by testing their time of flight through the same gravitational field. Here we use the time delays between correlated photons from cosmological transients to constrain the accuracy of the EEP. We take data from two gamma-ray bursts as an example, and use, as a lower limit to the theoretical time delays between different energies, delays arising from only the gravitational field of our own galaxy. We then show that the parameterized post-Newtonian parameter $γ$ is the same for photons over energy ranges between eV and MeV and between MeV and GeV to a part in $10^{-7}$, which is at least one order of magnitude better than previous limits. Combining this bound on the wavelength dependence of $γ$ with the absolute bound $|γ-1|<0.3\%$ from light-deflection measurements at optical (eV) wavelengths, we thus extend this absolute bound on $γ$ to GeV energies.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.