Paper detail

Cosmic star-formation history from a non-parametric inversion of infrared galaxy counts

[Abridged] This paper aims at providing new conservative constraints to the cosmic star-formation history from the empirical modeling of mid- and far-infrared data. We perform a non-parametric inversion of galaxy counts at 15, 24, 70, 160, and 850 microns simultaneously. It is a "blind" search (no redshift information is required) of all possible evolutions of the infrared luminosity function of galaxies, from which the evolution of the star-formation rate density and its uncertainties are derived. The cosmic infrared background (CIRB) measurements are used a posteriori to tighten the range of solutions. The inversion relies only on two hypotheses: (1) the luminosity function remains smooth both in redshift and luminosity, (2) a set of infrared spectral energy distributions (SEDs) of galaxies must be assumed. The range of star-formation histories that we derive is well constrained and consistent with redshift-based measurements from deep surveys. The redshift decompositions of the counts are also recovered successfully. Therefore, multi-wavelength counts and CIRB (both projected observations) alone seem to contain enough information to recover the cosmic star-formation history with quantifiable errors. A peak of the SFRD at z~2 is preferred, although higher redshifts are not excluded. We also find a good consistency between the observed evolution of the stellar mass density and the prediction from our model. Finally, the inability of the inversion to model perfectly and simultaneously all the multi-wavelength infrared counts (especially at 160 microns where an excess is seen around 20 mJ) implies either (i) the existence of a sub-population of colder galaxies, (ii) a larger dispersion of dust temperatures among local galaxies than expected, (iii) or a redshift evolution of the infrared SEDs of galaxies.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.