Paper detail

Cosmic Reionization Redux

We show that numerical simulations of reionization that resolve the Lyman Limit systems (and, thus, correctly count absorptions of ionizing photons) have converged to about 10% level for 5<z<6.2 and are in reasonable agreement (within 10%) with the SDSS data in this redshift interval. The SDSS data thus constraint the redshift of overlap of cosmic HII regions to z_{OVL} = 6.1+-0.15. At higher redshifts, the simulations are far from convergence on the mean Gunn-Peterson optical depth, but achieve good convergence for the mean neutral hydrogen fraction. The simulations that fit the SDSS data, however, do not have nearly enough resolution to resolve the earliest episodes of star formation, and are very far from converging on the precise value of the optical depth to Thompson scattering - any value between 6 and 10% is possible, depending on the convergence rate of the simulations and the fractional contribution of PopIII stars. This is generally consistent with the third-year WMAP results, but much higher resolution simulation are required to come up with the sufficiently precise value for the Thompson optical depth that can be statistically compared with the WMAP data.

preprint2006arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.