Paper detail

Cosmic Rays and Neutrinos from GRBs: Predictions versus Acceleration Modeling

The paper is devoted to the analysis of Fermi acceleration of protons in GRBs and its neutrino signature. We have compared the consequences of Bohm scaling and those of a Kolmogorov scaling, the latter being more reliable. The predictions about the energy limitation of UHE-protons by the various losses and the neutrino emissions turn out to be very sensitive to these scalings. We consider Kolmogorov scaling as the most realistic and predict a reasonable pp-neutrino emission around 100 GeV at the end of the radiative stage of the fireball expansion, for a large number of GRBs pending on their baryonic load. A second p$γ$-neutrino emission is expected with the acceleration of protons in the radiation free stage, but with a synchrotron loss limitation immediately followed by a severe expansion loss limitation. According to the Kolmogorov scaling, the protons could not reach the UHE-range. Anyway the large possibility of a two component neutrino emission would be an interesting clue of cosmic ray physics.

preprint2003arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.