Paper detail

Cosmic-ray-induced H$_2$ line emission: Astrochemical modeling and implications for JWST observations

Context: It has been proposed that H$_2$ near-infrared lines may be excited by cosmic rays and allow for a determination of the cosmic-ray ionization rate in dense gas. One-dimensional models show that measuring both the H$_2$ gas column density and H$_2$ line intensity enables a constraint on the cosmic-ray ionization rate as well as the spectral slope of low-energy cosmic-ray protons in the interstellar medium (ISM). Aims: We aim to investigate the impact of certain assumptions regarding the H$_2$ chemical models and ISM density distributions on the emission of cosmic-ray induced H$_2$ emission lines. This is of particular importance for utilizing observations of these lines with the James Webb Space Telescope to constrain the cosmic-ray ionization rate. Methods: We compare the predicted emission from cosmic-ray induced, ro-vibrationally excited H$_2$ emission lines for different one- and three-dimensional models with varying assumptions on the gas chemistry and density distribution. Results: We find that the model predictions of the H$_2$ line intensities for the (1-0)S(0), (1-0)Q(2), (1-0)O(2) and (1-0)O(4) transitions at 2.22, 2.41, 2.63 and 3.00 $μ$m, respectively, are relatively independent of the astro-chemical model and the gas density distribution when compared against the H$_2$ column density, making them robust tracer of the cosmic-ray ionization rate. Conclusions: We recommend the use of ro-vibrational H$_2$ line emission in combination with estimation of the cloud's H$_2$ column density, to constrain the ionization rate and the spectrum of low energy cosmic-rays.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.