Paper detail

Cosmic positron excess: is the dark matter solution a good bet?

The recent observation by the PAMELA satellite of a rising positron fraction up to $\sim$ 100 GeV has triggered a considerable amount of putative interpretations in terms of dark matter (DM) annihilation or decay. Here, we make a critical reassessment of such a possibility, recalling the elementary conditions with respect to the standard astrophysical background that would make it likely, showing that they are not fulfilled. Likewise, we argue that, as now well accepted, DM would need somewhat contrived properties to contribute significantly to the observed positron signal, even when including e.g. clumpiness effects. This means that most of natural DM candidates arising in particle physics beyond the standard model are not expected to be observed in the cosmic antimatter spectrum, unfortunately. However, this does not prevent them from remaining excellent DM candidates, this only points towards the crucial need of developing much more complex detection strategies (multimessenger, multiwavelength, multiscale searches).

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.