Paper detail

Cosmic Neutron Star Merger Rate and Gravitational Waves constrained by the R Process Nucleosynthesis

The cosmic evolution of the neutron star merger (NSM) rate can be deduced from the observed cosmic star formation rate. This allows to estimate the rate expected in the horizon of the gravitational wave detectors advanced Virgo and ad LIGO and to compare those rates with independent predictions. In this context, the rapid neutron capture process, or r process, can be used as a constraint assuming NSM is the main astrophysical site for this nucleosynthetic process. We compute the early cosmic evolution of a typical r process element, Europium. Eu yields from NSM are taken from recent nucleosynthesis calculations. The same approach allows to compute the cosmic rate of Core Collapse SuperNovae (CCSN) and the associated evolution of Eu. We find that the bulk of Eu observations at high iron abundance can be rather well fitted by either CCSN or NSM scenarios. However, at lower metallicity, the early Eu cosmic evolution favors NSM as the main astrophysical site for the r process. A comparison between our calculations and spectroscopic observations at very low metallicities allows to constrain the coalescence timescale in the NSM scenario to about 0.1 to 0.2 Gyr. These values are in agreement with the coalescence timescales of some observed binary pulsars. Finally, the cosmic evolution of Eu is used to put constraints on the NSM rate, the merger rate in the horizon of the gravitational wave detectors advanced Virgo/ad LIGO, as well as the expected rate of electromagnetic counterparts to mergers (kilonovae) in large near-infrared surveys.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.