Paper detail

Cosmic Neutrino Background Detection in Large-Neutrino-Mass Cosmologies

The Cosmic Neutrino Background (CNB) is a definite prediction of the standard cosmological model and its direct discovery would represent a milestone in cosmology and neutrino physics. In this work, we consider the capture of relic neutrinos on a tritium target as a possible way to detect the CNB, as aimed for by the PTOLEMY project. Crucial parameters for this measurement are the absolute neutrino mass $m_ν$ and the local neutrino number density $n_ν^{\rm loc}$. Within the $Λ$CDM model, cosmology provides a stringent upper limit on the sum of neutrino masses of $\sum m_ν< 0.12\,{\rm eV}$, with further improvements expected soon from galaxy surveys by DESI and EUCLID. This makes the prospects for a CNB detection and a neutrino mass measurement in the laboratory very difficult. In this context, we consider a set of non-standard cosmological models that allow for large neutrino masses ($m_ν\sim 1\,{\rm eV}$), potentially in reach of the KATRIN neutrino mass experiment or upcoming neutrinoless double-beta decay searches. We show that the CNB detection prospects could be much higher in some of these models compared to those in $Λ$CDM, and discuss the potential for such a detection to discriminate between cosmological scenarios. Moreover, we provide a simple rule to estimate the required values of energy resolution, exposure, and background rate for a PTOLEMY-like experiment to cover a certain region in the $(m_ν,\, n_ν^{\rm loc})$ parameter space. Alongside this paper, we publicly release a code to calculate the CNB sensitivity in a given cosmological model.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.