Paper detail

COSMIC-LAB: Unexpected Results from High-resolution Spectra of AGB Stars in Globular Clusters

This thesis is aimed at clarifying one of the least studied phases of stellar evolution: the asymptotic giant branch (AGB). Recent results obtained for Galactic globular clusters (GCs) suggest that the AGB stage may contain crucial information about the evolutionary history of exotic stars (Beccari et al. 2006) and multiple-populations (Campbell et al. 2013) in the parent cluster. The thesis presents the analysis of a large sample of high-resolution spectra of AGB stars in four Galactic GCs, acquired at the Very Large Telescope (ESO) and the 2.2 meter telescope (MPG). The obtained results provide evidence of a previously unknown physical mechanism affecting the neutral species of some chemical elements in the atmosphere of most AGB stars: because of it, the abundances derived from neutral lines are systematically underestimated, while those measured from ionized lines remain unaffected. Such a behaviour exactly corresponds to what expected in the case of non-local thermodynamic equilibrium (NLTE) conditions in the star atmosphere. For this reason, in this work we refer to it as "NLTE effect", with the caveat that this could be not the case. In fact, the current NLTE models are unable to account for the observed effect, thus demonstrating that either our comprehension of NLTE is not adequate enough, or that some more complex physical phenomena are occurring in AGB atmospheres. This effect has been found in all the investigated GCs. It affects most (but not all) AGB stars and, in some cases, also some RGB stars. It is particularly evident for iron and titanium lines (i.e., the elements providing the largest number of both neutral and ionized lines). The deep understanding of the detected phenomenon is of paramount importance since it has a huge impact on the proper determination of GC chemistry and enrichment history (for instance, it can mimic spurious iron spreads).

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.