Paper detail

Cosmic evolution of dust in galaxies: Methods and preliminary results

We investigate the redshift (z) evolution of dust properties, its dependences on initial conditions of galaxy formation, and physical correlations between dust, gas, and stellar contents at different z based on our original chemodynamical simulations of galaxy formation with dust growth and destruction. In this preliminary investigation, we first determine the reasonable ranges of the most important two parameters for dust evolution, i.e., the timescales of dust growth and destruction, by comparing the observed and simulated dust properties and molecular hydrogen H2 content of the Galaxy. We then investigate the z-evolution of dust-to-gas-ratios (D) and, H2 gas fraction (f_H2), and gas-phase chemical abundances (e.g., A_O=12+log(O/H)) in the simulated disk and dwarf galaxies. The principal results are as follows. Both D and f_H2 can rapidly increase during the early dissipative formation of galactic disks (z ~ 2-3) and the z-evolution of these depends on initial mass densities, spin parameters, and masses of galaxies. The observed A_O-D relation can be qualitatively reproduced, but the simulated dispersion of D at a given A_O is smaller. The simulated galaxies with larger total dust masses show larger H2 and stellar masses and higher f_H2. Disk galaxies show negative radial gradients of D and the gradients are steeper for more massive galaxies. Both dust-to-metal ratios and gas-phase [S/Fe] can be significantly different within a single galaxy and between different galaxies at different z, which means that fixed dust-to-metal ratios should not be used in investigating H2 contents and spectral energy distributions of galaxies.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.