Paper detail

Cosmic Degeneracies II: Structure formation in joint simulations of Warm Dark Matter and $f(R)$ gravity

We present for the first time the outcomes of a cosmological N-body simulation that simultaneously implements a Warm Dark Matter (WDM) particle candidate and a modified gravitational interaction in the form of $f(R)$ gravity, and compare its results with the individual effects of these two independent extensions of the standard $Λ$CDM scenario, and with the reference cosmology itself. We consider a rather extreme value of the WDM particle mass ($m_{\rm WDM}=0.4$ keV) and a single realisation of $f(R)$ gravity with $|\bar{f}_{R0}|=10^{-5}$, and we investigate the impact of these models and of their combination on a wide range of cosmological observables with the aim to identify possible observational degeneracies. In particular, we focus on the large-scale matter distribution, as well as on the statistical and structural properties of collapsed halos and cosmic voids. Differently from the case of combining $f(R)$ gravity with massive neutrinos -- previously investigated in Baldi et al. (2014) -- we find that most of the considered observables do not show any significant degeneracy due to the fact that WDM and $f(R)$ gravity are characterised by individual observational footprints with a very different functional dependence on cosmic scales and halo masses. In particular, this is the case for the nonlinear matter power spectrum in real space, for the halo and sub-halo mass functions, for the halo density profiles and for the concentration-mass relation. However, other observables -- like e.g. the halo bias -- do show some level of degeneracy between the two models, while a very strong degeneracy is observed for the nonlinear matter power spectrum in redshift space, for the density profiles of small cosmic voids -- with radius below $\approx 5$ Mpc$/h$ -- and for the voids abundance as a function of the void core density.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.