Paper detail

Coset Graphs in Bulk and Boundary Logarithmic Minimal Models

The logarithmic minimal models are not rational but, in the W-extended picture, they resemble rational conformal field theories. We argue that the W-projective representations are fundamental building blocks in both the boundary and bulk description of these theories. In the boundary theory, each W-projective representation arising from fundamental fusion is associated with a boundary condition. Multiplication in the associated Grothendieck ring leads to a Verlinde-like formula involving A-type twisted affine graphs A^{(2)}_{p} and their coset graphs A^{(2)}_{p,p'}=A^{(2)}_{p} x A^{(2)}_{p'}/Z_2. This provides compact formulas for the conformal partition functions with W-projective boundary conditions. On the torus, we propose modular invariant partition functions as sesquilinear forms in W-projective and rational minimal characters and observe that they are encoded by the same coset fusion graphs.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.