Paper detail

CORS Baade-Wesselink method in the Walraven photometric system: the Period-Radius and the Period-Luminosity relation of Classical Cepheids

We present a new derivation of the CORS Baade-Wesselink method in the Walraven photometric system. We solved the complete Baade-Wesselink equation by calibrating the surface brightness function with a recent grid of atmosphere models. The new approach was adopted to estimate the mean radii of a sample of Galactic Cepheids for which are available precise light curves in the Walraven bands. Current radii agree, within the errors, quite well with Cepheid radii based on recent optical and near-infrared interferometric measurements. We also tested the impact of the projection factor on the Period-Radius relation using two different values (p=1.36, p=1.27) that bracket the estimates available in the literature. We found that the agreement of our Period-Radius relation with similar empirical and theoretical Period-Radius relations in the recent literature, improves by changing the projection factor from p=1.36 to p=1.27. Our Period-Radius relation is log(R)=(0.75\pm 0.03)log(P)+(1.10 \pm 0.03), with a rms=0.03 dex. Thanks to accurate estimates of the effective temperature of the selected Cepheids, we also derived the Period-Luminosity relation in the V band and we found Mv=(-2.78 \pm 0.11)log(P)+(-1.42 \pm 0.11) with rms=0.13 mag, for p=1.27. It agrees quite well with recent results in the literature, while the relation for p=1.36 deviates by more than 2sigma. We conclude that, even taking into account the intrinsic dispersion of the obtained Period-Luminosity relations, that is roughly of the same order of magnitude as the effect of the projection factor, the results of this paper seem to favour the value p = 1.27.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.