Abstract
In the proof of Lemma 2.6 (2) the iteration of the map τ was not performed properly and in fact the lemma is wrong; a counterexample is given by f = \bar{x}_1and k = 2. This error does not, however, affect the geometric characterization given in Theorem 3.4 but only the attempt in Theorem 4.3 to express it as a first-order set of axioms. That attempt is incorrect; the main problem being that in general τV(f_1,..., f_s) 6= V(f_1..., f_s, τf_1,..., τf_s). But a different, indeed simpler, set of first-order axioms, which we will now describe, does express the geometric characterization.
Connections
Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.
Building this map preview
BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.
Reviews 0
Write a review
No reviews yet.
Discussion 0
Add a comment
No comments yet.