Paper detail

Corrigendum to "Maps between non-commutative spaces" [Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 356(7) (2004) 2927-2944]

The statement of Lemma 3.1 in the published paper is not correct. Lemma 3.1 is needed for the proof of Theorem 3.2. Theorem 3.2 as originally stated is true but its &#34;proof&#34; is not correct. Here we change the statements and proofs of Lemma 3.1 and Theorem 3.2. We also prove a new result. Let $k$ be a field, $A$ a left and right noetherian $\mathbb{N}$-graded $k$-algebra such that ${\rm dim}_k(A_n)< \infty$ for all $n$, and $J$ a graded two-sided ideal of $A$. If the non-commutative scheme ${\sf Proj}_{nc}(A)$ is isomorphic to a projective scheme $X$, then there is a closed subscheme $Z \subseteq X$ such that ${\sf Proj}_{nc}(A/J)$ is isomorphic to $Z$. This result is a geometric translation of what we actually prove: if the category ${\sf QGr}(A)$ is equivalent to ${\sf Qcoh}(X)$, then ${\sf QGr}(A/J)$ is equivalent to ${\rm Qcoh}(Z)$ for some closed subscheme $Z \subseteq X$.

preprint2016arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.