Paper detail

Correspondence Factor Analysis of Big Data Sets: A Case Study of 30 Million Words; and Contrasting Analytics using Apache Solr and Correspondence Analysis in R

We consider a large number of text data sets. These are cooking recipes. Term distribution and other distributional properties of the data are investigated. Our aim is to look at various analytical approaches which allow for mining of information on both high and low detail scales. Metric space embedding is fundamental to our interest in the semantic properties of this data. We consider the projection of all data into analyses of aggregated versions of the data. We contrast that with projection of aggregated versions of the data into analyses of all the data. Analogously for the term set, we look at analysis of selected terms. We also look at inherent term associations such as between singular and plural. In addition to our use of Correspondence Analysis in R, for latent semantic space mapping, we also use Apache Solr. Setting up the Solr server and carrying out querying is described. A further novelty is that querying is supported in Solr based on the principal factor plane mapping of all the data. This uses a bounding box query, based on factor projections.

preprint2015arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.