Paper detail

Correlations of Quasar Optical Spectra with Radio Morphology

(Abridged) With the largest homogeneous quasar sample with optical spectra and robust radio morphology classifications assembled to date, we investigate quasar radio and optical properties with unprecedented statistical power. The data consist of 4714 radio quasars from FIRST with S_{20}>2mJy and SDSS spectra. Radio morphology classes include core-only (core), core-lobe (lobe), core-jet (jet), lobe-core-lobe (triple), and double-lobe. We examine the optical colors of radio-morphology subsamples and find that radio quasars with core emission unresolved by FIRST (on 5" scale) have a redder color distribution than radio-quiet quasars (S_{20}<1mJy); other classes of radio quasars have optical color distributions similar to the radio-quiet quasars. This analysis also suggests that optical colors of z<2.7 SDSS quasars are not strongly (<0.1mag) biased blue. We show that the radio core-to-lobe flux density ratio (R) and the radio-to-optical (i-band) ratio of the quasar core (RI) are correlated, suggesting that both parameters are indicative of line-of-sight orientation. We investigate spectral line equivalent widths as a function of R and RI, including the [OIII] narrow line doublet and the CIV λ1549 and MgII λ2799 broad lines. We find that the rest equivalent widths (EWs) of the broad lines correlate positively with RI at the 4-8σ level. But we find no strong dependence of EW on R, in contrast to previous results. One interpretation is that EWs increase as the line-of-sight angle to the radio-jet axis decreases. These results are in stark contrast to commonly accepted orientation-based theories, which suggest that continuum emission should increase as the angle to the radio-jet axis decreases, resulting in smaller EW of emission lines (assumed isotropic). Finally, we find that the Baldwin effect in our sample does not depend on quasar radio morphology.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.