Paper detail

Correlation of velocity and density contributions to spectroscopic channel maps: Reality check on Kalberla et.al (2022)

The existence of magnetized turbulence in the interstellar HI is well accepted. A number of techniques to obtain turbulence spectrum and magnetic field direction and strength have been developed and successfully applied to HI spectroscopic data. To better separate the imprints of density and velocity fluctuations to the channel maps, a new theory-based technique, the Velocity Decomposition Algorithm (VDA,Yuen et.al 2021), has been created. The technique demonstrates that the intensity fluctuations are separated into a component pv that mostly arises from velocity fluctuations and pd that mostly arise from density fluctuations. The VDA helps to clarify the nature of the filamentary structure observed in channel maps. A recent publication (Kalberla et.al 2022,K22) claims that the application of VDA to HI4PI data provides negative correlation of pv and pd,which according to the authors invalidates the technique since it requires that pv and pd have zero correlation. However, the quantities pv and pd given by VDA are naturally orthogonal which can be trivially checked analytically or numerically. That means the correct application of the VDA to any data must provide zero correlation. This is the point that we clarify in this paper and search for the cause of the mistake in the application of the VDA in K22 that resulted in the erroneous conclusion. We prove analytically that by construction pv and pd are not correlated. We identify the likely mistake in the VDA expression that K22 used and reproduce their figures with the incorrect expression. We find that 14 out of 15 figures in K22 are invalid, and thus their criticism of the VDA is ill-founded and arises from their use of incorrect expressions. We conclude that the detrimental mistake that K22 made at their analysis completely invalidate their scientific claim that Y21 isnt compatible to observation.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.