Paper detail

Correlation of the dynamic contact angle with the capillary number and its hysteresis

The moving contact-line problem is of both theoretical and practical interest. The dynamic contact angle changes with the capillary number defined by the contact-line speed, and the correlation also depends on the equilibrium contact angle measured at the static state. This correlation is usually required as an input to the traditional solvers based on the Navier-Stokes-like equations, but it is simulated as an output in the current study using the lattice Boltzmann method (LBM) in a displacement process of two-immiscible fluids. The macroscopic theory and the molecular dynamics (MD) simulation had shown a linear scaling law for the cosine of dynamic contact angle, which is also observed in the previous LBM study in a short range of small capillary numbers and for two neutral wetting conditions. However, our study shows that this linear scaling law holds in the whole range of capillary numbers and is universal for all wetting conditions. In a special case of complete wetting (spreading) with a zero equilibrium contact angle, a thin film of the wetting fluid occurs when the wettability is very strong, which leads to a hysteresis that substantial capillary number is required to initiate the deviation of the dynamic contact angle from its equilibrium state. This observation is consistent with the previous report on a new mechanism for the static contact angle hysteresis due to the presence of free liquid films. With an increasing capillary number, the fluid-fluid interface starts oscillating before fingering. Different fingering patterns are observed for cases with different equilibrium contact angles.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.