Paper detail

Correlation of $γ$-ray and high-energy cosmic ray fluxes from the giant lobes of Centaurus A

The spectral energy distribution of giant lobes shows one main peak detected by the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe at low energy of $10^{-5}$ eV and a faint $γ$-ray flux imaged by Fermi Large Area Telescope at energy $\geq$ 100 MeV. On the other hand, Pierre Auger Observatory associated some ultra-high-energy cosmic rays with the direction of Centaurus A and IceCube reported 28 neutrino-induced events in a TeV - PeV energy range, although none of them related with this direction. In this work we describe the spectra for each of the lobes, the main peak with synchrotron radiation, and the high-energy emission with $pp$ interactions. Obtaining a good description of the main peak, we deduce the magnetic fields, electron densities and the age of the lobes. Describing successfully the $γ$-ray emission by pp interactions and considering as targets those thermal particles in the lobes with density in the range $10^{-10}$ to $10^{-4}\, {\rm cm}^{-3}$, we calculate the number of ultra-high-energy cosmic rays. Although $γ$-spectrum is well described with any density in the range, only when $10^{-4}\, {\rm cm}^{-3}$ is considered, the expected number of events is very similar to that observed by Pierre Auger Observatory, otherwise we obtain an excessive luminosity. In addition, correlating the $γ$-ray and neutrino fluxes through pp interactions we calculate the number of high-energy neutrinos expected in IceCube. Our analysis indicates that neutrinos above 1 TeV cannot be produced in the lobes of Centaurus A, which is consistent with the results recently published by IceCube Collaboration.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.