Paper detail

Correlation of multiple sclerosis incidence in the UK 1990-2010 with geomagnetic disturbances

Recently, Mackenzie et al. reported incidence and prevalence of multiple sclerosis (MS) in the UK from 1990-2010. Authors of this report indicated that they could not explain the cause of decreasing MS incidence trend in the UK during this time period. Such inability mainly resulted from the fact that often-cited hypotheses of MS, such as vitamin D deficiency hypothesis, cannot provide any answer for MS incidence trends. However, the newly proposed hypothesis of MS that is based on the biological effects of geomagnetic disturbances (GMD) has the ability to provide explanations for this observed trend. In this commentary, we showed that there is a significant correlation among alterations in GMD with changes in MS incidence and explained how researchers can use GMD hypothesis to evaluate such relations. Moreover, we clarified why we need a revision in the method of reporting MS incidence data to find actual environmental factor of MS.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.