Paper detail

Correlation between the isotropic energy and the peak energy at zero fluence for the individual pulses of GRBs: towards an universal physical correlation for the prompt emission

We find a strong correlation between the peak energy at zero fluence ($\rm E_{peak,0}$) and the isotropic energy ($\rm E_{γ,iso}$) of the 22 pulses of 9 Gamma Ray Bursts (GRB) detected by the Fermi satellite. The correlation holds for the individual pulses of each GRB, which shows the reality of the correlation. The derived correlation (Spearman correlation coefficient, $r$, is 0.96) is much stronger compared to the correlations using $\rm E_{peak}$ (in place of $\rm E_{peak,0}$) determined from the time-integrated spectrum ($r$ = 0.8), or the time-resolved spectrum not accounting for broad pulse structures ($r$ = 0.37), or the pulse-wise spectrum ($r$ = 0.89). Though the improvement in the $\rm E_{peak}$ - $\rm E_{γ,iso}$ relation (the Amati relation) for a pulse-wise analysis is known earlier, this is the first time a parameter derived from a joint spectral and timing fit to the data is shown to improve the correlation. We suggest that $\rm E_{peak,0}$, rather than $\rm E_{peak}$, is intrinsic to a GRB pulse and a natural choice as the parameter in the pulse-wise correlation studies.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.