Paper detail

Correlation between structural defects and optical properties of Cu2O nanowires grown by thermal oxidation

Cuprous oxide (Cu2O) nanowires were grown by a simple, catalyst-free thermal oxidation method starting from a copper foil substrate. Wire growth was performed at different conditions by varying oxygen partial pressure and heating temperature, and produced structural defects such as stacking faults and twin structures of grown nanowires were characterized by transmission electron microscopy. A moderate oxygen partial pressure ~5% with a relatively high temperature at 500 oC is found to be an optimal condition for growing high-quality Cu2O nanowires, while either lowering temperature or enhancing O2 partial pressure can yield higher density of planar defects. In order to further investigate optical properties of grown nanowires, photoluminescence measurements were also performed and correlated with structural characterization results, indicating that increase of structural defects such as stacking faults and twins tended to enhance broad defect-related emissions and suppress the exciton emissions near Cu2O band-edge.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.