Paper detail

Correlation between Global Parameters of Galaxies

Recently Disney et al. (2008) found a striking correlation among the five basic parameters that govern the galactic dynamics: R50, R90, Lr, Md, and MHI . They suggested that this is in conflict with the LCDM model, which predicts the hierarchical formation of cosmic structures from bottom up. In light of the importance of the issue, we performed a similar analysis on global parameters of galaxies with a significantly larger database and two additional parameters, LJ and RJ, of the near-infrared J band. We used databases from the Arecibo Legacy Fast Arecibo L-band Feed Array Survey for the atomic gas properties, the Sloan Digital Sky Survey for the optical properties, and the Two Micron All Sky Survey for the near-infrared properties, of the galaxies. We conducted principal component analysis (PCA) to find relations among these observational variables and confirmed that the five parameters in the work of Disney et al. are indeed correlated. The first principal component dominates the correlations among the five parameters and can explain 86% of the variation in the data. When color (g - i) is included, the first component still dominates and the color forms a second principal component that is almost independent of other parameters. The overall trend in our near-infrared PCA is very similar, except that color (i - J) seems even more decoupled from all other parameters. The dominance of the first principal component suggests that the structure of galaxies is governed by a single physical parameter. This confirms the observational results in Disney et al. However, based on the importance of the baryon physics in galaxy formation, we are not convinced that the hierarchical structure formation scenario and the notion of cold dark matter are necessarily flawed.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.