Paper detail

Correlation Analysis of SFI Peculiar Velocities

We present results of a statistical analysis of the SFI catalog of peculiar velocities, a recently completed survey of spiral field galaxies with I-band Tully-Fisher distances (Haynes et al. 1999). The velocity field statistic utilized is the velocity correlation function, $ψ_1(r)$ (Gorski et al. 1989). The analysis is performed in redshift space, so as to circumvent potential ambiguities connected with inhomogeneous Malmquist bias corrections. The results from the SFI sample are compared with linear-theory predictions. We generate a large set of mock samples, extracted from N-body simulations, which are used to assess the reliability of our analysis and to estimate the associated uncertainties. Defining $η_8=σ_8Ω_0^{0.6}$, we find that the measured $ψ_1(r)$ implies a degenerate constraint in the $η_8-Γ$ plane, with $η_8=(0.3 +/- 0.1) (Γ/0.2)^{0.5}$, at the $2σ$ level, for the inverse Tully-Fisher (ITF) calibration presented in this paper. Model constraints are quite sensitive to the ITF calibration. The other ITF calibrations by Giovanelli et al. (1997) and da Costa et al. (1998) both give, for $Γ=0.2$, $η_8\simeq 0.6$ as the best-fitting value.

preprint1999arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.