Paper detail

Correlated percolation and tricriticality

The recent proliferation of correlated percolation models---models where the addition of edges/vertices is no longer independent of other edges/vertices---has been motivated by the quest to find discontinuous percolation transitions. The leader in this proliferation is what is known as explosive percolation. A recent proof demonstrates that a large class of explosive percolation-type models does not, in fact, exhibit a discontinuous transition[O. Riordan and L. Warnke, Science, {\bf 333}, 322 (2011)]. We, on the other hand, discuss several correlated percolation models, the $k$-core model on random graphs, and the spiral and counter-balance models in two-dimensions, all exhibiting discontinuous transitions in an effort to identify the needed ingredients for such a transition. We then construct mixtures of these models to interpolate between a continuous transition and a discontinuous transition to search for a tricritical point. Using a powerful rate equation approach, we demonstrate that a mixture of $k=2$-core and $k=3$-core vertices on the random graph exhibits a tricritical point. However, for a mixture of $k$-core and counter-balance vertices, heuristic arguments and numerics suggest that there is a line of continuous transitions as the fraction of counter-balance vertices is increased from zero with the line ending at a discontinuous transition only when all vertices are counter-balance. Our results may have potential implications for glassy systems and a recent experiment on shearing a system of frictional particles to induce what is known as jamming.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.