Paper detail

Correcting for chromatic stellar activity effects in transits with multiband photometric monitoring: Application to WASP-52

The properties of inhomogeneities on the surface of active stars (i.e. dark spots and bright faculae) significantly influence the determination of the parameters of an exoplanet. The chromatic effect they have on transmission spectroscopy could affect the analysis of data from future space missions such as JWST and Ariel. To quantify and mitigate the effects of those surface phenomena, we developed a modelling approach to derive the surface distribution and properties of active regions by modelling simultaneous multi-wavelength time-series observables. By using the StarSim code, now featuring the capability to solve the inverse problem, we analysed $\sim$ 600 days of BVRI multiband photometry from TJO and STELLA telescopes exoplanet host star WASP-52. From the results, we simulated the chromatic contribution of surface phenomena on the observables of its transits. We are able to determine the relevant activity parameters of WASP-52 and reconstruct the time-evolving longitudinal map of active regions. The star shows a heterogeneous surface composed of dark spots with a mean temperature contrast of $575\pm150$ K with filling factors ranging from 3 to 14 %. We studied the chromatic effects on the depths of transits obtained at different epochs with different stellar spot distributions. For WASP-52, with peak-to-peak photometric variations of $\sim$7 % in the visible, the residual effects of dark spots on the measured transit depth, after applying the calculated corrections, are about $10^{-4}$ at 550 nm and $3\times10^{-5}$ at 6$μ$m. We demonstrate that by using contemporaneous ground-based multiband photometry of an active star, it is possible to reconstruct the parameters and distribution of active regions over time, and thus, quantify the chromatic effects on the planetary radii measured with transit spectroscopy and mitigate them by about an order of magnitude.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.