Paper detail

Correcting beliefs in the mean-field and Bethe approximations using linear response

Approximating marginals of a graphical model is one of the fundamental problems in the theory of networks. In a recent paper a method was shown to construct a variational free energy such that the linear response estimates, and maximum entropy estimates (for beliefs) are in agreement, with implications for direct and inverse Ising problems[1]. In this paper we demonstrate an extension of that method, incorporating new information from the response matrix, and we recover the adaptive-TAP equations as the first order approximation[2]. The method is flexible with respect to applications of the cluster variational method, special cases of this method include Naive Mean Field (NMF) and Bethe. We demonstrate that the new framework improves estimation of marginals by orders of magnitude over standard implementations in the weak coupling limit. Beyond the weakly coupled regime we show there is an improvement in a model where the NMF and Bethe approximations are known to be poor for reasons of frustration and short loops.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.