Paper detail

Coronal magnetic field strength from Type II radio emission: complementarity with Faraday rotation measurements

We analyzed the band splitting of a Type II radio burst observed on 1997 May 12 by ground- and space-based radio spectrometers. Type II radio emission is the most evident signature of coronal shock waves and the observed band splitting is generally interpreted as due to plasma emission from both upstream and downstream shock regions. From the inferred compression ratio we estimated, using the magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) Rankine-Hugoniot relations, the ambient Alfven Mach number. By means of the electron density obtained by inverting white-light polarized brightness (pB) coronagraph data and the shock speed inferred from the Type II frequency drift, we finally derived a radial profile for the magnetic field strength in the middle corona. The result was compared with the field profile obtained in May 1997 (but above $\sim 5 R_{sun}$) with Faraday rotation measurements of extragalactic radio sources occulted by the corona. The power law of the form $B(r)$ = 3.76 $r^{-2.29}$ Gauss inferred in that work nicely describes the combined set of data in a wide range of heliocentric distances ($r$ $\sim$ 1.8 - 14 $R_{sun}$).

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.