Paper detail

Coronal heating and solar wind formation in quiet Sun and coronal holes: a unified scenario

Coronal holes (CHs) are darker than quiet Sun (QS) when observed in coronal channels. This study aims to understand the similarities and differences between CHs and QS in the transition region using the \ion{Si}{4}~1394~Å line recorded by the Interface Region Imaging Spectrograph (IRIS) by considering the distribution of magnetic field measured by the Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager (HMI) onboard the Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO). We find that \ion{Si}{4} intensities obtained in CHs are lower than those obtained in QS for regions with identical magnetic flux densities. Moreover, the difference in intensities between CHs and QS increases with increasing magnetic flux. For the regions with equal magnetic flux density, QS line profiles are more redshifted than those measured in CHs. Moreover, the blue shifts measured in CHs show an increase with increasing magnetic flux density unlike in the QS. The non-thermal velocities in QS, as well as in CHs, show an increase with increasing magnetic flux. However, no significant difference was observed in QS and CHs, albeit a small deviation at small flux densities. Using these results, we propose a unified model for the heating of the corona in the QS and in CHs and the formation of the solar wind.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.