Paper detail

Coronal cooling as a result of mixing by the nonlinear Kelvin--Helmholtz instability

Recent observations show cool, oscillating prominence threads fading when observed in cool spectral lines and appearing in warm spectral lines. A proposed mechanism to explain this evolution is that the threads were heated by turbulence driven by the Kelvin--Helmholtz instability that developed as a result of wave-driven shear flows on the surface of the thread. As the Kelvin--Helmholtz instability is an instability that works to mix the fluids, in the solar corona it can be expected to work by mixing the cool prominence material with that of the hot corona to form a warm boundary layer. In this paper we develop a simple phenomenological model of nonlinear Kelvin--Helmholtz mixing, using it to determine the characteristic density and temperature of the mixing layer, which for the case under study with constant pressure across the two fluids are $ρ_{\rm mixed}=\sqrt{ρ_1ρ_2}$ and $T_{\rm mixed}=\sqrt{T_1T_2}$. One result from the model is that it provides an accurate, as determined by comparison with simulation results, determination of the kinetic energy in the mean velocity field. A consequence of this is that the magnitude of turbulence, and with it the energy that can be dissipated on fast time-scales, as driven by this instability can be determined. For the prominence-corona system, the mean temperature rise possible from turbulent heating is estimated to be less than 1\% of the characteristic temperature (which is found to be $10^5$\,K). These results highlight that mixing, and not heating, are likely to be the cause of the observed transition between cool to warm material in Okamoto et. al (2015). One consequence of this result is that the mixing creates a region with higher radiative loss rates on average than either of the original fluids, meaning that this instability could contribute a net loss of thermal energy from the corona, i.e. coronal cooling.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.