Paper detail

Coresets for Weight-Constrained Anisotropic Assignment and Clustering

The present paper constructs coresets for weight-constrained anisotropic assignment and clustering. In contrast to the well-studied unconstrained least-squares clustering problem, approximating the centroids of the clusters no longer suffices in the weight-constrained anisotropic case, as even the assignment of the points to best sites is involved. This assignment step is often the limiting factor in materials science, a problem that partially motivates our work. We build on a paper by Har-Peled and Kushal, who constructed coresets of size $\mathcal{O}\bigl(\frac{k^3}{ε^{d+1}}\bigr)$ for unconstrained least-squares clustering. We generalize and improve on their results in various ways, leading to even smaller coresets with a size of only $\mathcal{O}\bigl(\frac{k^2}{ε^{d+1}}\bigr)$ for weight-constrained anisotropic clustering. Moreover, we answer an open question on coreset designs in the negative, by showing that the total sensitivity can become as large as the cardinality of the original data set in the constrained case. Consequently, many techniques based on importance sampling do not apply to weight-constrained clustering.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.