Paper detail

Core Structure of Intracluster Gas: Isothermal Hydrostatic Equilibrium

We investigate core structures of X-ray emitting intracluster gas based on the so-called beta-model, which is an isothermal hydrostatic model often used in observational studies. We reconsider the beta-model and find that the virial temperature T_vir of a cluster may be represented better by beta T_X than T_X, where beta is the parameter obtained from the X-ray surface brightness and T_X is the emission-weighted mean temperature of the gas. We investigate 121 clusters observed by ROSAT and ASCA and find that the luminosity-temperature relation L_X - beta T_X is less steep than L_X - T_X. We classify the clusters into two core-size groups in order to investigate their properties in detail. While in the larger core group the core radius is marginally proportional to the virial radius, no significant relation is found for the smaller core group. This may suggest that the smaller cores reflect the presence of cD galaxies, effect of radiative cooling or asymmetry in the surface brightness. We examine such possibilities, and find that the clusters of smaller cores have shorter cooling time than the Hubble time, while no significant correlation is found with cD or asymmetry. We carry out hydrodynamical calculations to simulate the beta-model, intending to see the behavior of the isothermal gas under the gravitational potential including the dark matter and galaxies with or without a central cD galaxy. Calculations show r_c \propto r_vir and T_vir \simeq beta T consistently with our consideration to the beta-model. Also is found from calculations that the presence of a large cD galaxy may form a gas core \sim 40 kpc, which seems too small to account for the range of the core sizes, 40--80 kpc, of the smaller core group.

preprint2005arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.