Paper detail

Core-shift and spectral analysis of the 2006 radio flare in CTA102

The 2006 radio flare in the blazar CTA102 is the largest ever reported for this source. The analysis of the single--dish light curves revealed a possible shock-shock interaction as a scenario for the 2006 outburst. In order to confirm this hypothesis we analyzed eight multi-frequency (2 GHz - 86 GHz) VLBI observations covering the 2006 flare. We detected a radio component ejected around 2005.9 and a stationary feature around 0.1 mas away from the core. We also performed a core-shift and spectral analysis on the fully calibrated VLBI maps. The frequency dependent position of the core slightly deviates from the typical $ν^{-1}$-dependence during the flaring state. This behaviour may reflect a mismatch between magnetic energy density and energy density of the relativistic particles. From the core-shift corrected maps we obtained the spectral parameters and computed the temporal and spatial evolution of the jet intrinsic parameters such as the magnetic field and the particle density. The overall picture of the source could be best interpreted as an over-pressured jet perturbed by traveling shock waves.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.