Paper detail

Core Noise Requirements, and GW Sensitivities of AMIGO

AMIGO - The Astrodynamical Middle-frequency Interferometric GW (Gravitation-Wave) Observatory is a first-generation mid-frequency GW mission bridging the sensitivity gap between the high-frequency GW detectors and low-frequency space GW detectors. In our previous works, we have obtained appropriate heliocentric orbit formations of nominal arm length 10,000 km with their first-generation time-delay configurations satisfying frequency noise reduction requirement, and we have also worked out thrust-fuel friendly constant-arm heliocentric orbit formations. In this paper, we review and study noise requirements and present the corresponding GW sensitivities. From the design white position noises and acceleration noises, we obtain the GW sensitivities for the first-generation Michelson X TDI configuration of b-AMIGO (baseline AMIGO), AMIGO, and e-AMIGO (enhanced AMIGO). In view of the current technology development, we study and indicate steps to implement the AMIGO mission concept.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.