Paper detail

Core depletion from coalescing supermassive black holes

New measurements of the stellar-mass deficits at the centers of luminous elliptical galaxies are presented. These were derived considering the following observational facts. Firstly, ``core'' galaxies, which are thought to have had their inner region depleted from the coalesence of supermassive black holes, show an abrupt downward deviation of their inner light-profile relative to their outer Sersic profile. Second, ``power-law'' galaxies, having undisturbed profiles and no partially depleted core, have inner light-profiles that display no departure from the inward extrapolation of their outer Sersic profile. The central stellar deficits have therefore been derived from the difference in flux between the HST-observed galaxy light-profiles and the inward extrapolation of each galaxy's outer Sersic profile. This approach gives flux deficits ~0.1% of the total galaxy light, and mass deficits that are ~2 times each galaxy's central supermassive black hole mass. These results are in agreement with the theoretical expectations of mass ejection from binary black hole mergers and also with popular LCDM models of hierarchical galaxy formation. It is also explained why this result is some 10 times smaller than current observational estimates of the central mass deficit, and therefore implies a merger history for giant elliptical galaxies that is one order of magnitude less violent than previously suggested.

preprint2005arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.