Paper detail

Coordinated Optical and Radar Measurements of Low Velocity Meteors

To better estimate which luminous efficiency ($τ$) value is compatible with contemporary values of the ionization coefficient ($β$), we report a series of simultaneous optical and specular echo radar measurements of low speed meteors. A total of 1249 simultaneous EMCCD and radar meteors were identified. A subset of 36 events were analyzed in detail, with 29 having speed less than 20 km/s. These meteors had G-band magnitudes at the specular radar point between +4 and +7.7, with an average radiant power of 5W (assuming a 945 W power for a zero magnitude meteor) and masses of 1 - 10 mg. These correspond to a typical magnitude of +6. We find that $β$ / $τ$ strongly correlates with radiant power. All our simultaneous meteors had asteroidal-like orbits and six were found to be probable iron meteoroids, representing 20 percent of our slow velocity sample. Luminous efficiency values averaged 0.6% at low speed, ranging from less than 0.1% to almost 30%. No trend of luminous efficiency with speed was apparent, though a weak correlation between higher values of luminous efficiency and radiant power may be present.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.