Paper detail

Cooperative Tasking for Deterministic Specification Automata

In our previous work [1], a divide-and-conquer approach was proposed for cooperative tasking among multi-agent systems. The basic idea is to decompose a requested global specification into subtasks for individual agents such that the fulfillment of these subtasks by each individual agent leads to the satisfaction of the global specification as a team. It was shown that not all tasks can be decomposed. Furthermore, a necessary and sufficient condition was proposed for the decomposability of a task automaton between two cooperative agents. The current paper continues the results in [1] and proposes necessary and sufficient conditions for task decomposability with respect to arbitrary finite number of agents. It is further shown that the fulfillment of local specifications can guarantee the satisfaction of the global specification. This work provides hints for the designers on how to rule out the indecomposable task automata and enforce the decomposability conditions. The result therefore may pave the way towards a new perspective for decentralized cooperative control of multi-agent systems.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.