Paper detail

Cooperative Data Exchange with Unreliable Clients

Consider a set of clients in a broadcast network, each of which holds a subset of packets in the ground set X. In the (coded) cooperative data exchange problem, the clients need to recover all packets in X by exchanging coded packets over a lossless broadcast channel. Several previous works analyzed this problem under the assumption that each client initially holds a random subset of packets in X. In this paper we consider a generalization of this problem for settings in which an unknown (but of a certain size) subset of clients are unreliable and their packet transmissions are subject to arbitrary erasures. For the special case of one unreliable client, we derive a closed-form expression for the minimum number of transmissions required for each reliable client to obtain all packets held by other reliable clients (with probability approaching 1 as the number of packets tends to infinity). Furthermore, for the cases with more than one unreliable client, we provide an approximation solution in which the number of transmissions per packet is within an arbitrarily small additive factor from the value of the optimal solution.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.